Santería (Lucumí)

Folk magic

Tradition · Lucumi
Alternate Names
LucumíRegla de OchaSanteríaLa Regla Lucumí
Kind
Tradition
Region
Cuba (Havana, Matanzas, and the eastern provinces), and the Cuban diaspora in New York, Miami, Tampa and Los Angeles
Era
Nineteenth century in Cuba; practised now across the Americas
Background

Lucumí, usually called Santería in the United States, is the Cuban development of Yoruba religion, carried by enslaved Yoruba people and their descendants from the early nineteenth century and re-made in a Catholic colony that banned the religion and gave it the cover of the santoral. Each orisha is served by an initiate under a godparent, in a lineage with its own house (casa) and its own rules; the divination systems are Diloggún, read by initiated diviners with cowries, and Ifá, which is held by babalawos. The tradition has been documented by Cuban ethnographers since the early twentieth century and is now one of the large Afro-diasporic religions of the Americas.

Practice

Initiation is the centre: a person is seated with an orisha and becomes that orisha's child, in a costly, closed rite that obliges them for life and places them under a godparent's authority. The orisha are kept as consecrated stones in vessels, fed and cared for, and consulted before anything of consequence. Outside initiation, clients receive cleansings (despojo, ebó), herbal baths (omiero), and offerings under a santero's direction, and the diviner's reading determines what is to be done.

Purpose

To serve the orisha and keep one's destiny (ori) in order, to divine and cleanse, and to place a person under the protection of the orisha who owns them

Keywords
SanteriaLucumiOrishaRegla de ochaDiloggunIfaKariochaCasaInitiation
Magical Uses
ProtectionHealingDivinationProsperityHex breakingAncestor work
Ethical Note

The core of Lucumí is closed. Initiation, the consecration and handling of the orisha's stones, the recipes of omiero, and the interpretation of the odu belong to initiates and to their lineages, and the tradition's own authorities say so; the material is not public knowledge that a catalogue may reproduce. There is also a real argument inside the tradition about the commercialisation of initiation in the United States and about non-initiates publishing 'how to' books, and the corpus records the argument rather than settling it.

Referenced by 0

Nothing in the library points at this entry yet.