Hoodoo Is Not a Religion

Folk magic

Tradition · Hoodoo
Alternate Names
Hoodoo is not a religionConjure and religionThe religion question
Kind
Concept
Background

The most-repeated definitional claim about hoodoo is that it is not a religion, and it is made by practitioners, by scholars and by the tradition's own popular writers. It has no congregation, no liturgy, no ordination, no pantheon of its own and no creation story; it is a body of technique and relationship that is worked inside whatever religion the worker has, and in practice that has almost always been Black Protestant Christianity. The claim is a way of keeping hoodoo distinct from Vodou and Santería, which are religions, and of resisting the assumption that any Black spiritual practice is a cult.

Practice

The claim shapes practice in visible ways. A root doctor may be a church deacon, and the Bible on the work table is the same Bible that is read in church; the psalms said over a bath are prayers, not spells in the worker's own understanding; and a client is not asked to join anything. Where hoodoo has become religious - in the Spiritual churches, in the twentieth-century 'hoodoo churches' of Chicago and New Orleans - it is because a specific church adopted it, not because hoodoo has a religion of its own.

Keywords
HoodooReligionDefinitionConjureSpiritual churchCategoryDisagreement
Magical Uses
ProtectionHealingAncestor work
Ethical Note

The claim is also a boundary that protects: it keeps hoodoo from being treated as a religion that outsiders can convert to, and it keeps it from being conflated with traditions that have their own authorities and closed rites. But it should not be used to deny that conjure is a religious practice in the hands of the people who work it - the same person prays and works, and the two are not in compartments.

Referenced by 0

Nothing in the library points at this entry yet.